skip to main | skip to sidebar

May 16, 2012

Breaking News: CBS News: CBS adds four new series to its fall schedule

Comments
Breaking News: CBS News
Top Breaking News Stories from CBSNews.com
CBS adds four new series to its fall schedule
May 16th 2012, 13:52

The most-watched network officially announces its new fall TV schedule

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Top Stories - Google News: David Cameron raises possibility of euro breakup - The Guardian

Comments
Top Stories - Google News
Google News
David Cameron raises possibility of euro breakup - The Guardian
May 16th 2012, 13:45


The Guardian

David Cameron raises possibility of euro breakup
The Guardian
David Cameron appeared to cast doubt on the future of the euro during prime minister's questions when he said the eurozone "either has to make up or it is looking at a potential breakup". He told MPs: "That's the choice they have to make and it is a ...
David Cameron: Eurozone should 'make up or break up'Telegraph.co.uk
PMQs: David Cameron calls for decision on eurozone futureBBC News
Eurozone storm: David Cameron tells leaders to 'make up or break up'Evening Standard
The Independent -Spectator.co.uk -Reuters UK
all 41 news articles »

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

U.S. News: Oregon mom sued by church over online criticism

Comments
U.S. News
Stories from NBC reporters around the country.
thumbnail Oregon mom sued by church over online criticism
May 16th 2012, 13:22

An Oregon pastor, upset with online comments made by former church members, sues four former parishioners, seeking $500,000 for defamation. KGW's Wayne Havrelly reports.

By Becky Bratu, msnbc.com

An Oregon mother of seven is being sued for defamation by her former church over critical comments she made online.

Julie Anne Smith, a stay-at-home mom who home-schools her children, said church members began shunning her and her family after they left Beaverton Grace Bible Church almost four years ago.

She took to the Web in October 2009 to air her concerns about the church's practices on Google reviews, but said her comments kept being pushed down by other church members' more recent reviews. So in February of this year, Smith launched a blog called Beaverton Grace Bible Church Survivors to counteract what she called the "cat and mouse game" on Google.

"My primary issue was to discuss spiritual abuse in the church,” Smith told msnbc.com. “In essence, the legal suit is [O'Neal's] attempt of continuing that spiritual abuse.”


But days after Smith launched her blog, pastor Charles O'Neal filed a $500,000 lawsuit against Smith, her daughter and three other former church members, claiming some of the comments posted online amounted to defamation. O'Neal has been the pastor of the church for 13 years.

"We have not gone hastily to court," O'Neal said in a statement released to msnbc.com. "For three and a half years this group has been engaged in a public, church to church, and World Wide Web defamation, showing their willingness to discredit God, harm the church, harm wives, harm children, and harm the testimony of Christ's Gospel."

"It is BGBC's firm conviction that this cannot continue," he added.

In reaction to O'Neal's lawsuit, Smith's attorney filed a free speech anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss the suit. The motion will go before a judge on May 21.

Defamation lawsuits triggered by online comments are not unusual, but they typically involve businesses, American Civil Liberties Union attorney Aden Fine told msnbc.com.

"It’s very clear, especially in the age of the Internet, that companies don’t like to be criticized and don’t want the world to see this criticism, and so many companies have been very aggressive about suing people for criticizing them," Fine said.

"The result will be that people will be afraid of posting critical comments on the Internet," he said, adding that he expects these kinds of lawsuits to happen more even frequently in the future.

Smith, who used to play piano at the Beaverton church, said she and her family were asked to leave the congregation in November 2008, but it was almost a year before she took her grievances online. Church leaders, however, deny ever asking the Smiths to leave and claim her family left of their own accord.

“When you’re in a cult or a spiritually abusive place, your brain takes a while to process, to uncover all of that stuff that was going on, so I was kinda stewing,” she said. "Things were coming clear to me.”

Shunned?
Smith said the shunning by church members was so extreme that one of them even skidded out of a grocery parking lot to avoid her. "They treat you worse than a stranger," she said. "It just seems so cruel.”

She said her eldest daughter, Hannah, even left home about 4.5 years ago because she no longer wanted anything to do with the church. "My daughter willingly gave up many things to protect her sanity and leave the place that was emotionally killing her," Smith wrote on her blog.

Smith said she tried calling and emailing the church to resolve the conflict, but received no response.

The decision to eventually start posting reviews on Google came “out of desperation.”

"The mama bear in me came out," she said.

According to the complaint filed by the pastor, the defamatory statements included claims that O'Neal had "chosen to mislead the congregation" and "destroy relationships." Other messages quoted in the filing say the pastor is an example of "narcissism in the pulpit," and the church is "creepy" and uses "control tactics" for "spiritual abuse."

"You will be fine at this church if you never question the elders or pastor," the filing quotes another statement as saying.

Other comments Smith reportedly posted online state the church is "very destructive and disturbing."

"Leaders of cults convince their people that their church is the only true place to be..." and "turn a blind eye to known sex offenders in the church," Smith reportedly posted on Jan. 4.

O'Neal's attorney told msnbc.com in an email that the latter claim is "the second worst thing that any pastor can be accused of."

Court documents revealed the sex offender claim refers to a mentally disabled teenage church member who allegedly touched one of his sisters inappropriately. His family brought the matter up with the pastor, who said the boy "was never again allowed in the church nursery and never allowed to be alone in the company of children around the church.”

Smith said some of her statements were taken out of context in the filing, but she said she stands by everything she wrote.

Abuse 'unfounded'
Court filings state that another defendant, Meaghan Varela, allegedly made accusations of child abuse against the pastor, which led to a December 2008 visit from the Oregon Department of Human Services. The social worker informed O'Neal's daughter that someone also reported that pornography was being distributed to children at church.

"The allegations of child abuse filed by Meaghan Varela were extremely painful to my family," O'Neal's daughter said in a statement.

The DHS concluded that the child abuse allegations were "unfounded," court papers say.

ACLU's Fine said the court will look at whether the defendants' statements qualify as opinions or assertions of fact. Opinions are protected under free speech law.

Smith told msnbc.com she received messages of support from church members, and some told her they would like to post online about their own concerns but they're afraid.

"They've seen what happened to me," Smith said. "[O'Neal] sued me."

“He’s trying to bully people," she added.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

U.S. News: Mother of beaten mentally ill homeless man receives $1M settlement

Comments
U.S. News
Stories from NBC reporters around the country.
thumbnail Mother of beaten mentally ill homeless man receives $1M settlement
May 16th 2012, 13:41

By Samantha Tata and Beverly White, NBCLosAngeles.com

NBC Los Angeles

Kelly Thomas died in July 2011, days after a violent confrontation with Fullerton police in California.

The mother of a mentally ill homeless man who died after a violent confrontation with police has been granted a $1 million settlement from the city of Fullerton, Calif., officials said Tuesday.

In exchange, mother Cathy Thomas agreed not to pursue any further claims or lawsuits seeking damages for the July 2011 death of her son, Kelly, according to a statement released.

Fullerton city council members unanimously voted Tuesday to grant Cathy Thomas the settlement.

"Resolution of Ms. Thomas’ claim at this time allows her to begin the healing process and avoid what would likely be protracted, expensive and difficult civil litigation," according to the joint statement released by Thomas' attorney Brian Gurwitz and the City of Fullerton.

Read original story about Kelly Thomas settlement on NBCLosAngeles.com

The deal does not involve her ex-husband Ron Thomas, who has crusaded on behalf of his son, often referring to his legal pursuits as a war.

Kelly Thomas Case: Complete coverage from NBCLosAngeles.com | Timeline

"As far as Kelly's mom settling for a million dollars, surprise to me, but that's OK, that's fine," Ron Thomas said Tuesday after the meeting. "She felt that's what she needed to do and I support her in that.

"I'm all about the criminal side of this. I'm not concerned about the civil at this point, at all."

Settlement discussions were initiated by Cathy Thomas' lawyer ahead of a conclusion in the trial of the officers facing criminal charges in the death of her son, the statement noted.

Officer charged with second-degree murder
Officer Manuel Ramos is charged with second-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter in the death of Thomas. Cpl. Jay Cicinelli is charged with involuntary manslaughter and excessive force.

Both officers were ordered to stand trial on all charges in the death of Kelly Thomas. They are scheduled to appear in court on May 22.

Four other officers involved in the case were placed on paid administrative leave in the wake of the altercation, but are not facing criminal charges.

City officials said Tuesday that the Fullerton police chief has decided on punishment for those officers and will announce that decision when the law allows.

Kelly Thomas' injuries and the circumstances surrounding his death were explored during a two-day preliminary hearing earlier this month, when Judge Walter Schwarm heard from witnesses and viewed surveilance video of the beating.

In that video, Officer Manuel Ramos can be seen twirling his baton and speaking with Kelly Thomas for about 15 minutes before putting on latex gloves and ordering Thomas to put his feet out.

Thomas appears confused.

Ramos: "Now you see my fists?"

Thomas: "Yeah, what about ‘em?"

Ramos: "They’re getting ready to 'f' you up."

Thomas: "Start punching dude."

About 30 seconds later, Officer Joseph Wolfe arrives and as Kelly Thomas steps out of view, he is struck with their batons.

The altercation goes on for nearly five minutes. More officers arrive including Cicinelli, who uses his taser.

Kelly Thomas can be heard screaming for his father, telling the officers he cannot breathe and pleading with them to stop.

Following the altercation, Thomas entered into a five-day coma before he died.

Ultimately, Kelly Thomas died because of the force of the officers' compression on his chest, according to the District Attorney. The pressure made it impossible for Thomas to breathe, according to the DA's report.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Economy: Economic News, Policy & Analysis - The Washington Post: Boehner’s full speech on the debt ceiling, read it here

Comments
Economy: Economic News, Policy & Analysis - The Washington Post
Economy News: Get the latest headlines and in-depth coverage of economic news, policy, analysis and more from The Washington Post.
Boehner's full speech on the debt ceiling, read it here
May 16th 2012, 13:27

On Tuesday, Speaker John Boehner took the stage at the Peter G. Peterson's 2012 Fiscal Summit and outlined his intentions to again threaten the Obama administration with default in order to extract concessions on spending. I wrote a bit about why Boehner is adopting this strategy in Wednesday's Wonkbook. But here's his full speech:

Read full article >>

Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to Reddit Add to StumbleUpon

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Philly.com News: Local lottery ticket wins $872,000

Comments
Philly.com News
News from the Inquirer and Daily News.
Local lottery ticket wins $872,000
May 16th 2012, 13:00

Here’s a roundup of the latest lottery news. Camden County ticket wins $872,215. A Jersey Cash 5 ticket sold at Liquor Ranch, 4950 Marlton Pike, in Pennsauken matched all the numbers drawn Monday: 8, 18, 22, 26 and 36.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Philly.com News: Fire displances residents of NE Philly apartment building

Comments
Philly.com News
News from the Inquirer and Daily News.
Fire displances residents of NE Philly apartment building
May 16th 2012, 13:16

A two-alarm fire forced the evacuation of residents of an apartment building in Northeast Philadelphia. Dave Schrader, spokesman for the Red Cross of Southeastern Pennsylvania, said at least 30 apartments were affected by the fire at the Atrium Apartments at 2555 Welsh Road.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

U.S. News: US veterans to return war medals in protest

Comments
U.S. News
Stories from NBC reporters around the country.
thumbnail US veterans to return war medals in protest
May 16th 2012, 12:31

Iraq War veteran Steve Acheson at his home in Platteville, WI, on May 14, 2012.

By Miranda Leitsinger, msnbc.com

Iraq war veteran Steven Acheson will engage in the rarest of protests this weekend: He will hand back his military service medals at the NATO summit in Chicago, an act one veteran calls "disgraceful."

Acheson, who served for five years in the Army, including more than a year in Iraq that he says left him with PTSD and nightmares, is taking this step to protest the "war on terror" and the force leading it, NATO. He will be joined by a few dozen veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars who are concerned about the wars' fallout on veterans and civilians alike.

“I feel like this is a really good way for me to kind of, not clear my conscience, but just make a step in the direction of healing and kind of reconciling with the Afghan people and the Iraq people,” said Acheson, a 27-year-old college student from Wisconsin and a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, which includes soldiers who served in any of the post- 9/11 conflict zones. “… and let them know that we’re standing by their side and we’re not standing with NATO anymore. We don’t agree with the policies that are driving these wars.”

Acheson and 30-50 fellow 9/11-era veterans will carry their medals as they lead an anti-war march this Sunday through Chicago’s downtown area to the convention center where NATO is holding its summit. President Obama and other world leaders are scheduled to be among the summit attendees, and the city of Chicago is bracing for major protests.

Organizers are hoping the rally, which caps a week-long series of anti-NATO actions, will draw thousands. The Iraq and Afghanistan veterans will be flanked by Vietnam veterans and will hold a reconciliation ceremony with Afghans for Peace.

They intend to carry an American flag that they will lower and replace with a white one as they approach the summit venue. They are planning to pin their medals to the American flag, which they’d like to present to NATO officials. If they’re unable to do so, they may construct an ad hoc memorial or toss the medals toward the convention center -- like some 900 Vietnam veterans did in 1971 on Capitol Hill in an anti-war protest dubbed “Operation Dewey Canyon III.”

Barry Romo was West Coast coordinator for the Vietnam Veterans Against the War during the 1971 week-long demonstration.

“Wives left husbands; parents said … those medals were something you should be giving the grandkids. But I mean, the level of death was just really too much for us to deal with at that time and we said, you know, if there’s a question of medals versus lives then there was no question,” he said.

Returning the medals – even those that are given just for showing up to the theater of conflict, as are some of the ones the veterans plan to return – is not without controversy.

“They’re as much of a disgrace as the veterans back in the Vietnam days that did the same thing,” said retired Army 1st Sgt. Troy Steward, who served 22 years and is now a military blogger. “If these veterans aren’t proud of the service that they did … then they should never have accepted them (medals) in the first place.”

Steward, 43, of Buffalo, NY, and who served in Afghanistan, said the action was “disgraceful and disrespectful” to others who had served. While the veterans were welcome to express their opinions, he said, there were a lot of “better ways to do it than essentially shaming your military service and your brethren.”

Acheson will return his “Global War on Terrorism Service Medal” and the “Iraq Campaign Medal”; he is keeping others he received.

Aaron Hughes, a 30-year-old organizer for IVAW who served six years in the Army, including 15 months in Iraq and Kuwait, also will return two medals.

In the process of searching for a way to heal “we came to these symbols of the occupations, which are these medals that we carry around and we still have,” Hughes said. “They’re these … reminders of what we’ve done, that it’s time to let go of.”

“I think it’s something that many of us are conflicted about, but we also feel like this is the right action to take,” he noted, adding that there was a lot of consensus on the returning of the medals. “It is a sacrifice, but it’s one that we feel is worth it.”

But some cautioned the veterans to think carefully before handing over the medals.

“They become almost like family heirlooms in some ways,” said Adrian Lewis, a professor specializing in 20th century warfare at the University of Kansas in Lawrence. “It's not the norm to give them back. Most folks are proud of them. They feel like they earned them and they’re indications that they served their country.”

“They may regret it at some point ... and their family may ultimately regret it, too,” he added.

Unlike the Vietnam War, Americans today don’t have the same outrage over the current conflicts, Lewis said.

“Most Americans are not paying attention to the war ... they have no stake in it, no commitment to it,” he added, noting that he therefore didn’t expect the veterans’ medal protest to “be a big deal. It's not a game-changer.”

It’s not clear how many other veterans have taken similar action. The Department of Defense, the Air Force and Army said they did not keep records on how many medals have been given back.

"We're very proud of the service rendered by our soldiers and veterans, and they are free to do with their awards and decorations as they please," George Wright, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon, said in an e-mail.

Acheson said the veterans don’t have high expectations for how NATO officials will receive their protest. He also noted that he was keeping some of his medals because he was proud of his service, even though he was upset that he ended up fighting in a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

“I’m tired of seeing … fellow vets being redeployed with traumatic brain injuries and post-traumatic stress disorder, and I’m tired of seeing soldiers being deployed in general to an illegal war,” he said. “I just feel like we’ve spent enough money and enough lives over there … it’s time to come home.”

Do you think returning war medals in protest is 'disrespectful' of other veterans?

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Results
Total of 518 votes

44.4%
Yes
230 votes
55.6%
No
288 votes

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

U.S. News: Stimulus dollars funded erectile dysfunction study in California

Comments
U.S. News
Stories from NBC reporters around the country.
Stimulus dollars funded erectile dysfunction study in California
May 16th 2012, 12:41

By NBCBayArea.com

This may not have been the type of "stimulus" feds intended.

Two grants totaling nearly $1.5 million were distributed to the University of California San Francisco, NBCBayArea.com has discovered. The money was part of the federal stimulus program and went to studies into the erectile dysfunction of overweight middle aged men and the accurate reporting of someone's sexual history.

This is part of our ongoing series of investigations by the NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit into who got federal stimulus dollars, and why some projects did not break ground more than two years after receiving the grant.

The Investigative Unit looked closely at the federal government's decision to spend nearly $1.5 million of taxpayer money, money that came here to California. Grant number 1R01HD056950-01A2 was among the thousands of grants funded, receiving $1.2 million. This grant studied how to improve the accuracy of how people responded to questions about their sexual history.

Read original stimulus investigation on NBCBayArea.com

"If you honestly report on your sexual activity and number of partners?" Scott Amey asked with a sigh. "That's a good one."

Amey is the general council for  POGO, the Project on Government Oversight, a Washington D.C. nonpartisan non-profit government watchdog group. During our interview with an NBC crew he tried to explain why the government used that many tax dollars to improve self reports about high risk sexual behavior.

"I don't think most tax payers would think that would be a justified spending of stimulus money to conduct a sex study over fixing bridges and roads that are crumbling every day," Amey added.

NBC Bay Area talked to the University of California San Francisco, the institution that received the grant. "Does it make you wonder a little bit, stimulus money for a study like this?" Kovaleski asked Jeff Sheehy, who works at the UCSF Aids Research Center. "No it doesn't," he answered. "Because to my mind we save money if we get better health outcomes."

According to the grant, a good portion of the study will "Improve the accuracy of responses to questions," specifically questions about a person's sexual behavior. "Playing devil's advocate," Kovaleski said to Sheehy, "Do taxpayers need to spend $1.2 million to figure this out?""The judgment wasn't one that I was asked," Sheehy replied.

The NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit discovered that for $1.2 million, taxpayers funded a study that included 200 videotaped interviews at $6000 per interview. Kovaleski asked Sheehy to justify the spending. "I think the average person is going to look at $1.2 million dollars to interview 200 people and say Wow!" Sheehy defended the study. "I understand people could look at it and have issues but this is research," he said.

How many jobs did this actually create?
Kovaleski then asked about jobs. "How many jobs did this $1.26 million create?" "Well I can't really say," Sheehy said. "There were eleven researchers hired on the job, two consultants. Well I can't say. This has not been evaluated for job creation."

The number Sheehy quoted during an interview with NBC Bay Area did not match information on recovery.gov, the government's website for stimulus funds. According to the site, the grant produced 0.85 jobs. "It does make you scratch your head and wonder," Amey said, "Wait a second taxpayer dollars went to a sex study that barely funded less than one person."

Amey was also left questioning another UCSF grant. When asked by an NBC reporter about a study into erectile dysfunction involving overweight middle aged men he replied, "Oh boy."

The grant totaled more than a quarter million dollars. Although UCSF was willing to discuss our questions about the sexual history grant, the University declined to provide an expert to talk with the NBC Investigative Unit about the erectile dysfunction grant. In a written statement provided they said in part, "Obesity related health issues currently cost $147 billion per year in direct medical costs in the United States..... Health providers therefore continue to search for incentives to encourage people to live a healthier lifestyle, to benefit both indviduals and society.... Preliminary analysis indicates that is is feasible to enroll men in this type of research, they successfully lose the expected weight over a 12-week period, and they see an improvement in ED symptoms." You can read the entire statement by clicking here.

Click here to see the high risk sexual behavior grant

Click here to see the erectile dysfunction grant

If you have any other examples of questionable stimulus spending, we want to know. Call us at 1-888-996-TIPS (8477) or email theunit@nbcbayarea.com.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

U.S. News: Graveyard dating back to 19th century found below California construction site

Comments
U.S. News
Stories from NBC reporters around the country.
Graveyard dating back to 19th century found below California construction site
May 16th 2012, 13:07

By NBCBayArea.com

Construction at a portion of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center has stopped in San Jose, Calif. because crews have unearthed pine boxes filled with the bodies of those whose families couldn't afford their proper burials, NBC Bay Area has learned.

The pine boxes date back to between 1875 and 1935, and were discovered in February when construction crews were doing seismic survey work, Santa Clara County counsel Michael Rossi said Tuesday.


For more, visit NBCBayArea.com.

He said the county had no idea there was a cemetery on the property.

"It’s a potter’s field or a pauper’s graveyard. Between 1875 and 1935 at Valley Medical Center, people who died indigent, whose families couldn’t be found were buried at this site," Rossi said.

There are as many as 1,445 bodies on the site. The county filed a petition with the court to get permission to remove at least 100 of the pine coffins to make room for construction.

The county is looking into hiring an archaeologist who specializes in this type of find, Rossi said.

If anything identifiable is found, Rossi said they would publish the information in the newspaper to give families time to claim the remains.

After that, the county will ask the court's permission to dispose of the bodies in accordance to law.

A county map from 1932 shows the cemetery, but by 1958 there was no indication it existed. By 1966, there was an employee parking lot on top of the cemetery.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Your 2 hourly digest for U.S. News

Comments
U.S. News
Stories from NBC reporters around the country.
Graveyard found below California construction site
May 16th 2012, 13:07

 

By NBCBayArea.com

Construction at a portion of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center has stopped in San Jose, Calif. because crews have unearthed pine boxes filled with the bodies of those whose families couldn't afford their proper burials, NBC Bay Area has learned.

The pine boxes date back to between 1875 and 1935, and were discovered in February when construction crews were doing seismic survey work, Santa Clara County counsel Michael Rossi said Tuesday.


For more, visit NBCBayArea.com.

He said the county had no idea there was a cemetery on the property.

"It’s a potter’s field or a pauper’s graveyard. Between 1875 and 1935 at Valley Medical Center, people who died indigent, whose families couldn’t be found were buried at this site," Rossi said.

There are as many as 1,445 bodies on the site. The county filed a petition with the court to get permission to remove at least 100 of the pine coffins to make room for construction.

The county is looking into hiring an archaeologist who specializes in this type of find, Rossi said.

If anything identifiable is found, Rossi said they would publish the information in the newspaper to give families time to claim the remains.

After that, the county will ask the court's permission to dispose of the bodies in accordance to law.

A county map from 1932 shows the cemetery, but by 1958 there was no indication it existed. By 1966, there was an employee parking lot on top of the cemetery.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Stimulus dollars funded erectile dysfunction study in California
May 16th 2012, 12:41

By NBCBayArea.com

This may not have been the type of "stimulus" feds intended.

Two grants totaling nearly $1.5 million were distributed to the University of California San Francisco, NBCBayArea.com has discovered. The money was part of the federal stimulus program and went to studies into the erectile dysfunction of overweight middle aged men and the accurate reporting of someone's sexual history.

This is part of our ongoing series of investigations by the NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit into who got federal stimulus dollars, and why some projects did not break ground more than two years after receiving the grant.

The Investigative Unit looked closely at the federal government's decision to spend nearly $1.5 million of taxpayer money, money that came here to California. Grant number 1R01HD056950-01A2 was among the thousands of grants funded, receiving $1.2 million. This grant studied how to improve the accuracy of how people responded to questions about their sexual history.

Read original stimulus investigation on NBCBayArea.com

"If you honestly report on your sexual activity and number of partners?" Scott Amey asked with a sigh. "That's a good one."

Amey is the general council for  POGO, the Project on Government Oversight, a Washington D.C. nonpartisan non-profit government watchdog group. During our interview with an NBC crew he tried to explain why the government used that many tax dollars to improve self reports about high risk sexual behavior.

"I don't think most tax payers would think that would be a justified spending of stimulus money to conduct a sex study over fixing bridges and roads that are crumbling every day," Amey added.

NBC Bay Area talked to the University of California San Francisco, the institution that received the grant. "Does it make you wonder a little bit, stimulus money for a study like this?" Kovaleski asked Jeff Sheehy, who works at the UCSF Aids Research Center. "No it doesn't," he answered. "Because to my mind we save money if we get better health outcomes."

According to the grant, a good portion of the study will "Improve the accuracy of responses to questions," specifically questions about a person's sexual behavior. "Playing devil's advocate," Kovaleski said to Sheehy, "Do taxpayers need to spend $1.2 million to figure this out?""The judgment wasn't one that I was asked," Sheehy replied.

The NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit discovered that for $1.2 million, taxpayers funded a study that included 200 videotaped interviews at $6000 per interview. Kovaleski asked Sheehy to justify the spending. "I think the average person is going to look at $1.2 million dollars to interview 200 people and say Wow!" Sheehy defended the study. "I understand people could look at it and have issues but this is research," he said.

How many jobs did this actually create?
Kovaleski then asked about jobs. "How many jobs did this $1.26 million create?" "Well I can't really say," Sheehy said. "There were eleven researchers hired on the job, two consultants. Well I can't say. This has not been evaluated for job creation."

The number Sheehy quoted during an interview with NBC Bay Area did not match information on recovery.gov, the government's website for stimulus funds. According to the site, the grant produced 0.85 jobs. "It does make you scratch your head and wonder," Amey said, "Wait a second taxpayer dollars went to a sex study that barely funded less than one person."

Amey was also left questioning another UCSF grant. When asked by an NBC reporter about a study into erectile dysfunction involving overweight middle aged men he replied, "Oh boy."

The grant totaled more than a quarter million dollars. Although UCSF was willing to discuss our questions about the sexual history grant, the University declined to provide an expert to talk with the NBC Investigative Unit about the erectile dysfunction grant. In a written statement provided they said in part, "Obesity related health issues currently cost $147 billion per year in direct medical costs in the United States..... Health providers therefore continue to search for incentives to encourage people to live a healthier lifestyle, to benefit both indviduals and society.... Preliminary analysis indicates that is is feasible to enroll men in this type of research, they successfully lose the expected weight over a 12-week period, and they see an improvement in ED symptoms." You can read the entire statement by clicking here.

Click here to see the high risk sexual behavior grant

Click here to see the erectile dysfunction grant

If you have any other examples of questionable stimulus spending, we want to know. Call us at 1-888-996-TIPS (8477) or email theunit@nbcbayarea.com.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

thumbnail US veterans to return war medals in protest
May 16th 2012, 12:31

Iraq War veteran Steve Acheson at his home in Platteville, WI, on May 14, 2012.

By Miranda Leitsinger, msnbc.com

Iraq war veteran Steven Acheson will engage in the rarest of protests this weekend: He will hand back his military service medals at the NATO summit in Chicago, an act one veteran calls "disgraceful."

Acheson, who served for five years in the Army, including more than a year in Iraq that he says left him with PTSD and nightmares, is taking this step to protest the "war on terror" and the force leading it, NATO. He will be joined by a few dozen veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars who are concerned about the wars' fallout on veterans and civilians alike.

“I feel like this is a really good way for me to kind of, not clear my conscience, but just make a step in the direction of healing and kind of reconciling with the Afghan people and the Iraq people,” said Acheson, a 27-year-old college student from Wisconsin and a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, which includes soldiers who served in any of the post- 9/11 conflict zones. “… and let them know that we’re standing by their side and we’re not standing with NATO anymore. We don’t agree with the policies that are driving these wars.”

Acheson and 30-50 fellow 9/11-era veterans will carry their medals as they lead an anti-war march this Sunday through Chicago’s downtown area to the convention center where NATO is holding its summit. President Obama and other world leaders are scheduled to be among the summit attendees, and the city of Chicago is bracing for major protests.

Organizers are hoping the rally, which caps a week-long series of anti-NATO actions, will draw thousands. The Iraq and Afghanistan veterans will be flanked by Vietnam veterans and will hold a reconciliation ceremony with Afghans for Peace.

They intend to carry an American flag that they will lower and replace with a white one as they approach the summit venue. They are planning to pin their medals to the American flag, which they’d like to present to NATO officials. If they’re unable to do so, they may construct an ad hoc memorial or toss the medals toward the convention center -- like some 900 Vietnam veterans did in 1971 on Capitol Hill in an anti-war protest dubbed “Operation Dewey Canyon III.”

Barry Romo was West Coast coordinator for the Vietnam Veterans Against the War during the 1971 week-long demonstration.

“Wives left husbands; parents said … those medals were something you should be giving the grandkids. But I mean, the level of death was just really too much for us to deal with at that time and we said, you know, if there’s a question of medals versus lives then there was no question,” he said.

Returning the medals – even those that are given just for showing up to the theater of conflict, as are some of the ones the veterans plan to return – is not without controversy.

“They’re as much of a disgrace as the veterans back in the Vietnam days that did the same thing,” said retired Army 1st Sgt. Troy Steward, who served 22 years and is now a military blogger. “If these veterans aren’t proud of the service that they did … then they should never have accepted them (medals) in the first place.”

Steward, 43, of Buffalo, NY, and who served in Afghanistan, said the action was “disgraceful and disrespectful” to others who had served. While the veterans were welcome to express their opinions, he said, there were a lot of “better ways to do it than essentially shaming your military service and your brethren.”

Acheson will return his “Global War on Terrorism Service Medal” and the “Iraq Campaign Medal”; he is keeping others he received.

Aaron Hughes, a 30-year-old organizer for IVAW who served six years in the Army, including 15 months in Iraq and Kuwait, also will return two medals.

In the process of searching for a way to heal “we came to these symbols of the occupations, which are these medals that we carry around and we still have,” Hughes said. “They’re these … reminders of what we’ve done, that it’s time to let go of.”

“I think it’s something that many of us are conflicted about, but we also feel like this is the right action to take,” he noted, adding that there was a lot of consensus on the returning of the medals. “It is a sacrifice, but it’s one that we feel is worth it.”

But some cautioned the veterans to think carefully before handing over the medals.

“They become almost like family heirlooms in some ways,” said Adrian Lewis, a professor specializing in 20th century warfare at the University of Kansas in Lawrence. “It's not the norm to give them back. Most folks are proud of them. They feel like they earned them and they’re indications that they served their country.”

“They may regret it at some point ... and their family may ultimately regret it, too,” he added.

Unlike the Vietnam War, Americans today don’t have the same outrage over the current conflicts, Lewis said.

“Most Americans are not paying attention to the war ... they have no stake in it, no commitment to it,” he added, noting that he therefore didn’t expect the veterans’ medal protest to “be a big deal. It's not a game-changer.”

It’s not clear how many other veterans have taken similar action. The Department of Defense, the Air Force and Army said they did not keep records on how many medals have been given back.

"We're very proud of the service rendered by our soldiers and veterans, and they are free to do with their awards and decorations as they please," George Wright, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon, said in an e-mail.

Acheson said the veterans don’t have high expectations for how NATO officials will receive their protest. He also noted that he was keeping some of his medals because he was proud of his service, even though he was upset that he ended up fighting in a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

“I’m tired of seeing … fellow vets being redeployed with traumatic brain injuries and post-traumatic stress disorder, and I’m tired of seeing soldiers being deployed in general to an illegal war,” he said. “I just feel like we’ve spent enough money and enough lives over there … it’s time to come home.”

Do you think returning war medals in protest is 'disrespectful' of other veterans?

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Results
Total of 485 votes

44.3%
Yes
215 votes
55.7%
No
270 votes

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
 

TOP POPULAR NEWS Powered by Blogger