skip to main | skip to sidebar

Apr 12, 2012

Your 2 hourly digest for U.S. News

U.S. News
Stories from NBC reporters around the country.
thumbnail American Airlines sues former flight attendant behind parody videos
Apr 12th 2012, 22:00

By Rob Lovitt, msnbc.com contributor

 

American Airlines is going after a former flight attendant, not for his mocking videos, but for allegedly posting confidential information on his blog. KXAS's Scott Gordon reports.

 

The ongoing battle between American Airlines and an outspoken and recently fired flight attendant is heading to court.

On Tuesday, the Fort Worth-based airline filed a lawsuit against Gailen David and 10 other “John Doe” defendants, alleging, among other things, breach of duty, conspiracy and trade infringement.

The suit is the latest chapter in a saga that traces its roots to David’s role as The Sky Steward, an online alter ego he created in 2007. Last month, he was fired after posting several videos in which he parodied American executives, often dressed as a woman, and took them to task for the airline’s financial troubles.

American Airlines filed for bankruptcy protection last fall.

David maintains he was “absolutely” fired because of the videos; the airline says it was because he violated rules regarding passenger privacy, which is also the basis of the current action.

According to the suit, David revealed the travel plans of several American executives and their spouses and claimed that members of the company’s mileage program were bumped from first class to make room for them. The suit also references but doesn’t identify 10 current American employees who allegedly provided David with the information he publicized.

“The travel information of American Airlines' passengers is considered both private and confidential, regardless of their relationship to the company,” said spokesman Bruce Hicks in a statement. “This lawsuit is designed to identify and hold legally accountable those employees who have and who continue to provide private and confidential passenger travel information and personal employee information to former employee Gailen David.”

“I was kind of expecting a lawsuit eventually,” David told msnbc.com. He has yet to file a legal response to the suit. “I think they thought that after they fired me, it would take the wind out of my sails, but it didn’t.”

Instead, he suggests that the legal blustering will lead to even more evidence of executive mismanagement. Although he declined to reveal how he got his information, he told msnbc.com that “when it’s revealed how the information was relayed to me, it’s going to be extremely embarrassing to American Airlines.”

In the meantime, experts suggest that if the case goes to court, the outcome will be a function of the court’s views on passenger confidentiality rather than conspiracy, trade infringement or, for that matter, David’s commentary or termination.

“As a general rule, revealing passenger information is beyond the pale,” said Franklyn Steinberg III, an aviation and employment attorney in Somerville, N.J. “But these cases are very much decided on the specific facts of each case. It’s hard to draw on a rule that will decide the situation.”

Rob Lovitt is a longtime travel writer who still believes the journey is as important as the destination. Follow him at Twitter.

More on Overhead Bin

thumbnail U.S. rights appointee Zuhdi Jasser hits raw nerve for American Muslims
Apr 12th 2012, 22:00

Seth Wenig / AP file

Zuhdi Jasser takes part a news conference in front of police headquarters in New York, on March 5. Jasser was there with dozens of activists to demonstrate support for the NYPD and its surveillance of Muslim groups across the Northeast.

By Kari Huus, msnbc.com

One way to elicit a collective groan among established American Muslim leaders: Mention Zuhdi Jasser. The U.S. Senate did just that recently when it appointed the Arizona physician and activist to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.

On Thursday, a coalition of 64 groups representing American Muslim lawyers, students, Arab Americans and mosques and an array of advocacy organizations called on the legislators to rescind the naming of Jasser – a controversial figure who many American Muslims see as a shill for anti-Muslim bigots.

The stated mission of the commission is "to promote the freedom of religion and belief, and it seeks to combat religious extremism, intolerance, and repression throughout the world."


In the letter of protest delivered Thursday, critics said Jasser’s "consistent support for measures that threaten and diminish religious freedoms within the United States demonstrates his deplorable lack of understanding of and commitment to religious freedom and undermines the USCIRF’s express purpose."  The letter was delivered to Senate leaders including Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who chose Jasser.

McConnell’s office did not respond to calls for comment on the appointment.

The commission has a backroom role in U.S. foreign policy by putting together reports for the president, the State Department and Congress on violations of religious freedom and designating "countries of concern." Appointments for the commission's 10 slots are divided among the president and the two parties in each chamber of the legislature. In this case, the appointment was made by Senate minority leader McConnell.

"There are a myriad of American Muslim scholars, lawyers and activists who have demonstrated clear commitments to the principles of religious freedom and tolerance and would easily qualify for this position," said Farhana Khera, executive director for the nonprofit civil rights group Muslim Advocates and former counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee.

"Since Jasser has no such commitment and is not qualified, Sen. McConnell should rescind his appointment," she said.

Jasser, a U.S.-born Muslim of Syrian descent and physician in Phoenix, takes the position that many of the groups and mosques considered "mainstream" Muslims in the United States are actually breeding a type of political Islam that aims to convert and control other Americans.

The American Islamic Forum for Democracy, a nonprofit Jasser founded in 2003, "advocates for the preservation of the founding principles of the U.S. Constitution, liberty and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state," according to the group's website.

Jasser has been sought by the media and others to represent moderate Muslims, and at times pitted against leaders of more-established Muslim groups in the United States.

He gained a national spotlight at the first of the controversial hearings chaired by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., on the threat from radicalization in the U.S. Muslim community.  While many civil rights and Muslim groups argued that the premise of the hearings was biased, Jasser testified that the threat of domestic extremists was real.

Jasser supported an Oklahoma referendum that would ban the consideration of "Shariah law" in courts, one of many such measures around the country that are being challenged for their constitutionality.

He recently applauded a surveillance program run by the New York Police Department that broadly targeted the Muslim population based on religion without evidence or suspicion of wrongdoing.

On March 5, Jasser led a small demonstration in New York aiming "to put an end to the one-sided international media coverage of attacks against the most successful and legal counter-terrorism programs of the NYPD."

"In fact, our anti-Islamist Muslims are often the primary targets of radical groups," said Jasser in a press release on the event. "As a silent majority of American Muslims, we thank God every day for the NYPD."

Jasser had not yet responded to requests from msnbc.com for an interview about the protest, but he commented to a publication in the nation's capital when the critics were still circulating their petition among American Muslim groups.

"They want to publicly tar and feather me so if our Commission has any interactions with foreign governments where they’ve been working with Islamists and other groups I’ve criticized … they can publicly say, 'He doesn’t represent us,'" Jasser told the Washington Free Beacon. "They’re trying to marginalize the relationships we could have with their allies abroad."

One of the Muslim groups that Jasser asserts has a concealed Islamist agenda is the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a large nonprofit civil rights organization.

Corey Saylor, legislative director for CAIR, suggests the opposite is true.

"It is unfortunate that anti-Muslim forces are propping up Jasser because he says what they want to hear and gives them cover for their activities," said Saylor. "It’s troubling."

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

 

Follow Kari Huus on Facebook

thumbnail George Zimmerman expected to take the stand in Trayvon Martin murder case, legal observers say
Apr 12th 2012, 21:46

Radio host Michael Smerconish and former U.S. attorney Kendall Coffey explain why George Zimmerman's first court appearance is only the beginning of what could become a long legal process.

By Jeff Black, msnbc.com

If George Zimmerman, the killer of Trayvon Martin, wants to claim self-defense under Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, he most certainly will have to testify, criminal defense attorneys in Florida told msnbc.com.

It is rare in criminal cases for defendants to be called to testify because they have a right against self-incrimination and it opens them up to sharp questions from prosecutors.

But Zimmerman, charged with second-degree murder in the fatal shooting of Martin during a scuffle in a gated Sanford, Fla., community on Feb. 26, will need to explain why he thought his life was in danger when he shot the unarmed black teenager, attorneys not involved with the case say.


Zimmerman, 28, is white and Hispanic.

Zimmerman's new attorney: Who is Mark O'Mara?

The killing of Martin, 17, has sparked protests across the nation as well as emotionally charged debate about race relations and self-defense laws. Even President Barack Obama has commented on the case, saying, "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon."

“There is no way around it,” Derek Byrd, incoming president of the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, told msnbc.com. “I personally believe he would have to testify. It’s not like a case where there were three other witnesses. Who else is going to say he was fearing for his safety when he shot Trayvon Martin?”

Mark O'Mara, attorney for George Zimmerman, says that the Martin family has been through a horrible tragedy, and that he won't be going after the mother of a deceased child for saying the incident was an 'accident.'

Nellie King, a Palm Beach-area defense attorney who is president of the association of defense lawyers, agreed.

“Zimmerman is the only person who can re-enact what took place that night,” King said.

Prosecutors contend George Zimmerman provoked confrontation with Trayvon Martin

Zimmerman’s testimony would likely take place at an evidentiary hearing, under which the “Stand Your Ground” law allows the defense to ask a judge for immunity from prosecution because it’s a clear case of self-defense.

Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara, has said self-defense will be a strategy in the case.

It could be months before such a hearing takes place, however. Here are the steps in the legal process and possible strategies Zimmerman might take.

First appearance: Zimmerman appeared in court on Thursday for what amounted to a brief reading of the charge. Judge Mark E. Herr said he found probable cause to move ahead with the case with an arraignment held May 29 before Circuit Court Judge Jessica Recksiedler.

Bond hearing: O’Mara said Thursday he will submit a bond motion before the arraignment. If granted, Zimmerman would get out of jail while court proceedings continue. According to legal experts, to deny the bond motion, the state must have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman is clearly guilty of the charge against him. Here the judge could set the bond at whatever amount she sees fit. If the judge sets a high bond amount, Zimmerman’s attorney can make a motion to reduce it, arguing that Zimmerman doesn't have the money and isn't a risk to flee.

Arraignment: The May 29 arraignment is a formal reading of the charge against Zimmerman. According to legal experts, arraignments in Florida often take place electronically through the filing of paperwork with attorneys, and defendants do not necessarily need to appear in court.

Discovery of evidence: Under Florida legal rules, prosecutors have 15 days after an arrest to give the defense what evidence they have against Zimmerman. As a practical matter, prosecutors make available evidence as they get it. The evidence is expected to include witness testimony from Sanford police officers and others, forensic evidence, photographs and audio recordings. An unusual feature of legal procedure in Florida, according to attorneys, is that defense attorneys can subpoena prosecution witnesses to take part in depositions. In the depositions, witnesses are asked specific questions, on the record, about what they saw and heard along with more probing questions such as how well they see and hear, how close they were to the crime and if anyone else was nearby. These types of questions can also lead to the discovery of more witnesses and information. In other states, such questioning of prosecution witnesses only takes place during a trial.

Evidentiary hearing: Under the Stand Your Ground law, as interpreted by the Florida Supreme Court, a judge can grant Zimmerman immunity from prosecution in this type of hearing. Here is where Zimmerman is expected to tell why he feared for his life when he scuffled with Martin. Those hearings are like a “mini trials,” King said, in which experts on Zimmerman’s emotional state will also likely be called to testify, as well as any other witnesses in the case. If a judge decides there is enough evidence to show Zimmerman did act in self-defense based on the preponderance of the evidence, the judge can rule that Zimmerman can’t be prosecuted, essentially dismissing the criminal case.

Motion for change of venue: Typically one of the last motions before trial begins. Zimmerman’s attorney hasn’t said if he will seek to change where the trial takes place, or if it will take place in Seminole County Court in Sanford, where Martin was killed and emotions run high. Some say since publicity in the case is so widespread, there may be nowhere to find a jury not tainted by news coverage, and Sanford may be as good a place as any other location.

Trial: It could be at least a year before a trial, with the first step the choosing a jury. Here potential jurors are expected to be asked what they know about the case from media accounts, their feelings on race relations and other factors that may influence their decision-making. Attorneys from both sides will have the opportunity to ask questions and dismiss people they don’t believe are fit for the jury. Legal observers say the fact that Zimmerman shot an unarmed teenager will be the central focus of prosecutors at trial. Prosecutors will need to contend that the block watch volunteer's shooting of Martin was rooted in hatred or ill will -- the necessary element to prove second-degree murder. The defense will argue that Zimmerman acted in self-defense and feared for his life. The jury can decide if Zimmerman is guilty of second-degree murder or the lesser charge of manslaughter.

Sentencing: In Florida, the judge will decide what sentence will be imposed if Zimmerman is found guilty.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
 

TOP POPULAR NEWS Powered by Blogger